|
Jan
12
2006
|
ANTARCTIC ICE MARATHON & 100k COMPLETED |
The results from the Antartic Ice Marathon are in, and the boys in green have done a marvelous job. Full results below.
Ontop of this Irish man Richard Donavan ran the 100km endurance event alone. The first ever of it’s kind on the continent.
Donovan negotiated the difficult terrain in a
pair of trail running shoes and was covered from head to toe with
layers of clothing to protect against the elements. The race distance
represented almost 10% of the distance to the South Pole.
Full story on: outsider.ie :: View topic - ANTARCTIC ICE MARATHON & 100k COMPLETED
The complete results are:
MARATHON
Evgeniy Gorkov (RUS) 5:09:38
John O’Regan (IRL) 5:16:31
Steven Seaton (ENG) 5:39:35
Mark Tointon (ENG) 5:43:38
Wendy MacKinnon (SCO) 6:33:30
Stephen Cushing (ENG) 6:41:06
Stevie Matthews (ENG) 6:51:04
Diarmuid Smyth (IRL) 6:54:27
Mike Pierce (USA) 7:10:50100k
Richard Donovan (IRL) 15.43.55

Ireland
Scotland
Wales
England
France
Switzerland
Italy
USA





Latest Comments (6):
Hmmm. I was wondering where to run a marathon next January. I guess this would make quite a change from the Disney World Marathon!
http://www.connemarathon.com/ is a very good one apparently.
also see: http://www.marathontour.com/
-RGB
This race is pretty cool but just one question…if only one person runs a “race” like this 100k, can it still be called a “race”? Doesn’t that just make it a time trial?
The feature event was the 26.2 mile Ice Marathon, the 100K was an additional event and originaly had 4 or 5 competitors but time constraints didn’t allow any recovery time between the 2 races and this in turn meant that the other competitors except for Richard Donovan couldn’t compete. I was one of the competitors and withdrew from the race an hour before the start, so it was a race.
Concerning the comment about a “race”: In this first Antarctic 100k in January 2006, more than one person actually started the event. However, Richard Donovan was the only person to complete it and he did so running alone. The only reference to the word “race” was in referring to the race distance. There was no mention anyway, whatsoever, of Richard ‘winning’ (which he did in the second edition of the event when others also finished).
Thanks for that Mike. Are you involved yourself? (In my opinion a race is still a race if it’s advertised as a race and open to others and even if only one person shows up and completes it, I’d still consider them the “winner”). I suppose it’s just words?
Post A Comment:
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI